You are asking whether the issue is sever enough that the states soveirnity should be derecognised. This is a serious act.
I could the same kind of argument to back-up the invasion of another country. Unusual numbers are sickly heavy resulting in deaths and the goverment is unwilling to take adequate measures to fix the problem. People refuse treatment on basis of their local customs and medical reforms are held back because of beliefs that it is a political ruse. The land is Murica and the customs are “mah freedoms” and the plotter is commies.
The post seems to argue that the Liberian situation could be so bad that the theorethical question would be relevant. There are many factors and levels of standards that “too stupid” and “care of” could be interpreted with. I find it likely that you are downplaying the importance of their autonomy and idealising the impact the suggested action would have. I think you are motivated more by the hate for their belief-system than the even alleged harm. Should it similar effectiveness came from a emotional neutral stupidness source I don’t think you would be advocating what you are advocating.
You are asking whether the issue is sever enough that the states soveirnity should be derecognised. This is a serious act.
I could the same kind of argument to back-up the invasion of another country. Unusual numbers are sickly heavy resulting in deaths and the goverment is unwilling to take adequate measures to fix the problem. People refuse treatment on basis of their local customs and medical reforms are held back because of beliefs that it is a political ruse. The land is Murica and the customs are “mah freedoms” and the plotter is commies.
The post seems to argue that the Liberian situation could be so bad that the theorethical question would be relevant. There are many factors and levels of standards that “too stupid” and “care of” could be interpreted with. I find it likely that you are downplaying the importance of their autonomy and idealising the impact the suggested action would have. I think you are motivated more by the hate for their belief-system than the even alleged harm. Should it similar effectiveness came from a emotional neutral stupidness source I don’t think you would be advocating what you are advocating.
I have seen essentially similar comments made by western believers (such as japan getting tsunamied because of perversions). Know that those make tasty media bites which makes it easy to slip into a distorted generalization. I think you are in a position to have larger than average returns on practising empathy to develop your views